Lett Pro-Palestinian protesters retake MIT encampment, occupy building at Rhode Island School of Design
President Joe Biden said Sunday that the U.S. shall respond after three American troops were killed and dozens more were injured in an overnight drone strike in northeast Jordan near the Syrian border. Biden blamed Iran-backed militias for the first U.S. fatalities after months of strikes by such groups against American forces across the Middle East since the start of the Israel-Hamas war.Biden, who was traveling in South Carolina, asked for a moment of silence during an appearance at a Baptist church s banque
stanley tumblers t hall. We had a tough day last night in the Middle East. We lost three brave souls in an attack on one of our bases, he said. After
stanley cup the moment of silence, Biden added, and we shall respond. With an increasing risk of military escalation in the region, U.S. officials were working to conclusively identify the precise group responsible for the attack, but they have assessed that one of several Iranian-backed groups was behind it.Biden said in a written statement that the United States will hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner of our choosing. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said we will take all necessary actions to defend the United States, our troops, and our interests. Iran-backed fighters in east Syr
stanley spain ia began evacuating their posts, fearing U.S. airstrikes, according to Omar Abu Layla, a Europe-based activist who heads the Deir Ezzor 24 media outlet. He told The Associated Press that the areas are the strongholds of Mayadeen and Boukam Yyrr Apple s iOS 17 is out. Here are the new privacy and safety features
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge to a
stanley becher Kentucky law requiring doctors to describe ultrasound images and play fetal heartbeat sound to abortion seekers.
copo stanley Kentucky argued the law is simple and straightforward, calling it
stanley mugs part of an informed-consent process. The law, Kentucky said, does nothing more than require that women who are considering an abortion be provided with information that is truthful, non-misleading and relevant to their decision of whether to have an abortion. The court rejected the case without comment or noted dissent by any of the justices.Challengers, including an abortion clinic, argued that the law forced patients to see the images even if she didn t want to, and that it violated doctors First Amendment rights.The law had been upheld by the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals, but that ruling was on hold pending the Supreme Court appeal. As a First Amendment matter, there is nothing suspect with a State s requiring a doctor, before performing an abortion, to make truthful, non-misleading factual disclosures, relevant to informed consent, even if those disclosures relate to unborn life and have the effect of persuading the patient not to have an abortion, the appeals court held in its ruling.Civil rights groups blasted the court s decision not to take up the challenge. By refusing to review the 6th Circuit s ruling, the Supreme Court has rubber-stamped extreme political interference in the
