Lemq McCain sees Russian hacking as threat, Trump calls reports of such interference ridiculous
NEW YORK AP 鈥?A New York appeals court has again upheld a gag order that bars聽Donald Trump聽from commenting about court personnel in his聽civil fraud trial, ruling Thursday that the former presidents lawyers used the wrong legal mechanism to fight the restriction.A four-judge panel in the state mid-level appellate court ruled Thursday that Trump law
stanley cup yers erred by suing trial Judge Arthur Engoron, who imposed the gag order in October after Trump disparaged his law clerk.Instead, the appellate judges wrote, Trump lawyers should ;ve followed the normal appeals process by asking Engoron to reverse the gag order and then, if denied, fighting that decision in a higher court.Trump lawyer Christopher Kise said the decision denies his client the only path available to expedited relief and places his fundamental constitutional rights in a procedural purgatory. We filed the petition because the ordinary appellate process is essentially pointless in this context as it cannot possibly be completed in time to reverse the ongoing harm, Kise said.READ MORE: Biden t
stanley cup ells donors if Trump wasnt running Im not sure Id be running. We cannot let him winThe appeals court ruling came a day after testimony wrapped in the 2陆-month trial in New York Attorney General Letitia James ; la
stanley cup wsuit. Closing arguments are scheduled for Jan. 11 in the case, which threatens Trump real estate empire. Engoron said he hopes to have a verdict by the end of January.Trumps lawy Lzaa North Korean officials wear Kim Jong Un pins for first time as nation boosts personality cult
Poor children generally find themselves with heavier needs as opposed to other students when attending school. In 23 states, however, poorer school districts are not getting the money they need to help these students.The Washington Post reported on Thursday that in 23 states, per-pupil spending by state and local governments is lower in poor school districts than in rich ones, in some cases as much as 33 percent lower. Nationwide, the average amount spent on students in poor school districts is $9,270 versus $10,721 for students in wealthy districts, based on U.S. Census data released by the National Center for Education Statistics last month.T
adidas campus he state with the largest difference, at 33 percent, is Pennsylvania, followed by Vermont and Missouri, at 18.1
jordan and 17 percent respectively. In contrast, Indiana spends 17.1 percent more on students in poor districts than for those in wealthy ones, and Minnesota, 15.4 percent. Colorado, Iowa and Utah spend essentially the exact same amount per student in both poor and rich districts. What it says very clearly is that we have, in many place
stanley cup s, school systems that are separate and unequal, Education Secretary Arne Duncan told the Post. Money by itself is never the only answer, but giving kids who start out already behind in life, giving them less resources is unconscionable, and its far too common. In general, wealthier counties are able to raise more money through taxes for the school system than poor counties are, and often send som
