Kymg If You Could Turn Back the Clock on Tech, What Year Would You Choose
LOS ANGELES - Seven in 10 pet owners say they believe animal shelters should be allowed to euthanize animals only when they are too sick to be treated or too aggressive to be adopted.Only a quarter of the people who took part in a recent AP-Petside poll said animal shelters should sometimes be allowed to put animals down as a popula
stanley mug tion control measure.Gisela Aguila, 51, of Miramar, Fla., believes shelter animals should only be euthanized whe
stanley mug n there is no chance they ll be adopted, for example, if they are extremely ill or aggressive. I don t think shelters should be euthanizing animals to control the population, she said.She d like to see an end to shelters destroying animals when they run out of room, saying, We are way too civilized of a society to allow this. Euthanized kitten fuels outrage in Ariz. But Leslie Surprenant, 53, of Saugerties, N.Y., believes shelters should be allowed to control populations. She says no-kill shelters that only accept animals with good prospects for adoption or that turn away animals once the shelter reaches capacity do not solve the problem. euthanasia That doesn t truly mean no-kill shelters. It means there are more animals out on the streets being hit by cars and starving and living in dumpsters, said Surprenant, who has two dogs and a cat. It does not mean the general population is lower; it just means that they ve opted not to kill. Surprenant believes spaying and neutering is the way to go
stanley website . In fact, higher rates of spaying Qpyr Researchers Isolate A Gut Microbe That Combats Food Allergies
It hasn ;t been a great decade for air travel. And while crappily designed boarding passes aren ;t at the very top of my list of axes to grind with the airline industry, they
stanley taza ;re more important than you might think. Just take a look at this great version by UK designer Peter Smart for proof. Smart is better known for his 50 Problems in 50 Days project, which led him across the world on a 14-flight marathon to solve, as the name suggests, 50 every-day problems. Somewhere between check-in and boarding, I realized something, he writes. Boarding passes are pretty awful. Indeed. And though other designers have attempted redesigns, not much has changed: Smart decided to try his hand, and what re
stanley cup sulted is an exceedingly sensible and thoughtful redesign. You can read Smart own presentation here, but the condensed version is goes like this. First, Smart gives the pass a new, vertical format that fits perfectly into a passport when folded in half and can be printed on airlines ; current machines . This is designed to prevent the inevitable misplacement or tearing of the current long, horizontal passes: He then set up a simple information hierarchy, which organizes information chronologically鈥攕o terminal, then gate, then seat, then arrival,
stanley cup and so forth. Finally, an overhaul of the type design adds to the legibility and detracts from the sheer visual clutter: Beyond the sheer practicality of Smart solution, my reaction
